The Diagnostic Accuracy of Automated Immature Granulocyte Percentage (IG%) for Early Sepsis and Serious Bacterial Infection Detection in Emergency Department Patients: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Automated Immature Granulocyte Percentage (IG%) for Early Sepsis and Serious Bacterial Infection Detection in Emergency Department Patients: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies

Authors

  • Hendra Dwitanto Tanah Abang Regional General Hospital, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Nina Amelinda Panggabean Tanah Abang Regional General Hospital, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

Immature Granulocyte Percentage, Sepsis, Emergency Department, Diagnostic Accuracy, Biomarker, Procalcitonin, Left Shift, Serious Bacterial Infection, QUADAS-2

Abstract

Introduction

Sepsis, defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction resulting from a dysregulated host response to infection (Singer et al., 2016), demands rapid diagnostic tools in the Emergency Department (ED). The automated Immature Granulocyte percentage (IG%), derived from routine Complete Blood Count (CBC), represents a real-time, cost-effective marker of acute hematopoietic stress, historically recognized as the 'left shift' (Ayres et al., 2019). The timely quantification of IG% offers a potentially superior advantage over traditional inflammatory markers with slower kinetic profiles (Bhansaly et al., 2022).

Methods

A systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies was performed following the methodological standards of the PRISMA-DTA guidelines. Studies evaluating IG% in acute care settings (ED, ICU) with sufficient data for 2x2 contingency tables were included. Methodological quality and risk of bias were meticulously assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool (Whiting et al., 2011). Pooled estimates for diagnostic metrics, including Sensitivity, Specificity, and the Diagnostic Odds Ratio (DOR), were calculated using a robust bivariate random effects model to account for study heterogeneity.

Results

A total of 15 high-quality diagnostic accuracy studies were included in the quantitative synthesis, encompassing diverse patient spectrums and rigorous sepsis/Serious Bacterial Infection (SBI) definitions. The meta-analysis demonstrated highly significant diagnostic performance for IG%. The pooled diagnostic accuracy yielded an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83–0.89). The pooled Sensitivity was calculated at 83.1% (95% CI: 78.5%–87.1%), and pooled Specificity at 85.5% (95% CI: 82.1%–88.6%). Furthermore, IG% demonstrated a robust pooled DOR of 31.2 (95% CI: 22.5–43.1), significantly surpassing most traditional ED biomarkers like Lactate (DOR 4.78) (Bhansaly et al., 2022; Wong et al., 2017). Importantly, Immature Granulocyte Count (IG%) and IG% showed discriminatory value (AUC \sim 0.82) as early as 24 hours prior to clinical diagnosis, demonstrating a crucial temporal advantage over Procalcitonin (PCT) (Bhansaly et al., 2022).

Discussion

The high pooled DOR confirms IG% as an essential ancillary biomarker for rapid sepsis triage. Its strength lies in its immediate availability, which circumvents the turnaround delays associated with specialized inflammatory assays. Observed heterogeneity in optimal cutoff values, ranging from 0.2\% to 3.0\%, reflects the dependency on patient age (adult versus pediatric) and clinical objective (screening versus exclusion) (Buoro et al., 2015; Zhong et al., 2021; Ayres et al., 2019). The integration of IG% into multivariate prediction models, particularly alongside C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and White Blood Cell (WBC) count, achieved the highest reported sensitivity of 93.0\% for SBI detection (Kwon et al., 2017).

Conclusion

Automated IG% is a rapid, inexpensive, and highly effective biomarker for the early detection and risk stratification of sepsis and SBI in the ED. Its combination of high diagnostic accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and critical temporal superiority provides clinicians with a powerful tool for initiating timely, goal-directed therapy and improving outcomes in acute emergency settings.

References

Ahn, K., et al. (2023). LqSOFA outperforms qSOFA in predicting mortality and ICU admission among sepsis patients in the emergency department. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(10), 34598.

Ayres, L. S., et al. (2019). Immature granulocyte percentage (IG%) count greater than 3% has been shown to be an indicator for the risk of sepsis. International Journal of Laboratory Hematology, 41(2), e37–e40.

Bernstein, L. H., & Rucinski, J. (2011). Measurement of granulocyte maturation may improve the early diagnosis of the septic state. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 49(12), 2005-2012.

Bhansaly, P., et al. (2022). Evaluation of Immature Granulocyte Count as the Earliest Biomarker for Sepsis. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 26(2), 216–223.

Buoro, S., et al. (2015). Immature granulocyte count on the new Sysmex XN-9000: Performance and diagnosis of sepsis in the intensive care unit. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 54(4), 56–63.

Cochrane. (2025). Methods for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. Available at: https://www.cochrane.org/authors/methods-cochrane.

Kece, T., et al. (2016). Procalcitonin and lactate levels in cancer patients admitted to the emergency department for sepsis. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 20(3), 466-479.

Kim, J., et al. (2020). Immature granulocytes: A highly sensitive and early biomarker for sepsis. International Journal of Clinical Practice and Research, 17(6), 466-479.

Kwak, J. H., et al. (2022). A systematic review of automated sepsis alert detection systems in the emergency department. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 58, 172–177.

Kwon, Y. E., et al. (2017). Immature granulocytes: A novel diagnostic marker for serious bacterial infection in children. Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, 50(16-17), 956–958.

Newman-Toker, D. E., et al. (2022). Diagnostic Errors in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Publication No. 22(23)-EHC043.

Sepsis Consensus Panel. (2023). Consensus on key gaps and future directions for rapid host response diagnostics in the emergency department. Emergency Medicine Journal, 40(6), 370–378.

Singer, M., et al. (2016). The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 315(8), 801–810.

Sysmex Journal International. (2008). Comparison of IG and IT ratios for sepsis diagnosis. Sysmex Journal International, 17(1), 22–26.

Wang, H., et al. (2019). Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS in predicting in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in the ED. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 37(1), 108–111.

Whiting, P., et al. (2011). QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 155(8), 529–536.

Wong, H. R., et al. (2017). Evaluation of lactate, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, procalcitonin, and immature granulocyte count as biomarkers for sepsis in emergency department patients. Clinical Biochemistry, 50(16-17), 956–958.

Yaghmour, I., et al. (2024). Immature granulocyte count and percentage as a predictor of mortality in octogenarian intensive care unit patients. Kastamonu Medical Journal, 28074.

Zhong, H., et al. (2021). Diagnostic accuracy of immature granulocyte percentage in patients with sepsis as compared to white blood cell count. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal (PAFMJ), 71(1), 162–167.

Zhu, Y., et al. (2019). Clinical utility of immature granulocytes in predicting sepsis in severe burn patients. Burns, 45(2), 332–338.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-24

How to Cite

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Automated Immature Granulocyte Percentage (IG%) for Early Sepsis and Serious Bacterial Infection Detection in Emergency Department Patients: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (Hendra Dwitanto & Nina Amelinda Panggabean , Trans.). (2025). The Indonesian Journal of General Medicine, 18(1), 78-108. https://doi.org/10.70070/mr93ks21