Pathologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs Open Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
Keywords:
Pathologic Outcomes, Laparoscopic, Open Mesorectal Excision, Rectal CancerAbstract
Background: The exploration of surgical approaches for rectal cancer has garnered significant attention in recent years, particularly in evaluating the pathologic outcomes associated with laparoscopic versus open mesorectal excision. Literature Review: The literature review on the pathologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open mesorectal excision for rectal cancer reveals a nuanced understanding of the comparative effectiveness of these surgical approaches. The introduction establishes the significance of complete mesorectal excision (TME) as a critical factor in improving patient outcomes, with both laparoscopic and open techniques being scrutinized for their oncological safety and efficacy. Conclusion: In conclusion, the literature presents a complex landscape regarding the pathologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. While laparoscopic techniques show promise in enhancing short-term recovery and maintaining oncological adequacy, the ongoing concerns about long-term outcomes and the quality of surgical margins necessitate further investigation. The evidence suggests that both approaches have their merits, but careful consideration and adherence to oncological principles are essential to optimize patient outcomes.
References
Rîşnoveanu, N., Dima, A. C., & Ciurea, M., 2010. The use of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Yang, Q., Xiu, P., Qi, X., Yi, G., & Xu, L., 2013. Surgical Margins and Short-Term Results of Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Ferko, A., Orhalmi, J., Dusek, T., Chobola, M., Hovorkova, E., & Hadzi Nikolov, D., 2014. Higher risk of incomplete mesorectal excision and positive circumferential margin in low rectal cancer regardless of surgical technique. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Zheng, J., Feng, X., Yang, Z., Hu, W., Luo, Y., & Li, Y., 2016. The comprehensive therapeutic effects of rectal surgery are better in laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Martínez-Pérez, A., Clotilde Carra, M., Brunetti, F., & de’Angelis, N., 2017. Short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic vs open rectal excision for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Manchón, P., Aliste, L., Biondo, S., Espin, E., Pera Román, M., M. Targarona, E., Pallarès, N., Vernet, R., Alfons Espinàs Piñol, J., Guarga, A., & Maria Borràs Andrés, J., 2019. A propensity-score-matched analysis of laparoscopic vs open surgery for rectal cancer in a population-based study. [PDF]
A Melstrom, K. & M Kaiser, A., 2020. Role of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Maria Garbarino, G., Canali, G., Tarantino, G., Costa, G., Ferri, M., Balducci, G., Pilozzi, E., Berardi, G., & Mercantini, P., 2021. Laparoscopic versus open rectal resection: a 1:2 propensity score–matched analysis of oncological adequateness, short- and long-term outcomes. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Jiang, W. Z., Xu, J. M., Xing, J. D., Qiu, H. Z., Wang, Z. Q., Kang, L., Deng, H. J., Chen, W. P., Zhang, Q. T., Du, X. H., Yang, C. K., Guo, Y. C., Zhong, M., Ye, K., You, J., Xu, D. B., Li, X. X., Xiong, Z. G., Tao, K. X., Ding, K. F., Zang, W. D., Feng, Y., Pan, Z. Z., Wu, A. W., Huang, F., Huang, Y., Wei, Y., Su, X. Q., & Chi, P., 2022. Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopy-Assisted vs Open Surgery for Patients With Low Rectal Cancer: The LASRE Randomized Clinical Trial. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Adrian, Fitriana (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
