Which Anti-VEGF Therapy (Ranibizumab, Bevacizumab, or Aflibercept) Demonstrates The Most Cost-Effective Outcomes For Treating Age-Related Macular Degeneration ? : A Systematic Review

Which Anti-VEGF Therapy (Ranibizumab, Bevacizumab, or Aflibercept) Demonstrates The Most Cost-Effective Outcomes For Treating Age-Related Macular Degeneration ? : A Systematic Review

Authors

  • Olivia Putri Chairunnisa Dr. H. Abdul Moeloek Regional General Hospital, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
  • Mia Audina Muhammad Ali Kasim General Hospital, Gayo Lues Regency, Aceh, Indonesia
  • Irawati Cipto Mangunkusumo Central General Hospital, Special Region of jakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

Age-related macular degeneration, anti-VEGF therapy, cost-effectiveness, bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept

Abstract

Introduction: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), particularly its neovascular form (nAMD), is a leading cause of irreversible vision loss in the elderly. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies, including ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept, have revolutionized treatment by inhibiting pathological angiogenesis. However, their high costs and varying efficacy profiles necessitate a comprehensive evaluation of cost-effectiveness to guide clinical and policy decisions. Methods: This systematic review adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, analyzing 40 studies from databases like PubMed, Sagepub, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria focused on adult AMD patients treated with anti-VEGF agents, reporting both clinical outcomes (e.g., visual acuity, central retinal thickness) and cost data. Data extraction included study design, intervention details, patient demographics, visual outcomes, cost-effectiveness metrics, and adverse events. Results: Bevacizumab emerged as the most cost-effective option, with annual costs significantly lower than ranibizumab and aflibercept (e.g., €27,087/year vs. +€4,000–€6,000). All three agents showed comparable efficacy in visual acuity improvements, though aflibercept required fewer injections (7.0/year vs. ranibizumab’s 5.8/year). Safety profiles were similar, but bevacizumab was associated with marginally higher systemic risks. Economic analyses highlighted bevacizumab’s dominance in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), while aflibercept’s reduced injection frequency offered potential long-term savings. Discussion: Despite bevacizumab’s economic advantages, its off-label status and safety concerns limit universal adoption. Ranibizumab and aflibercept, though FDA-approved, present higher financial burdens. Geographic disparities in drug pricing and dosing regimens further influence cost-effectiveness. Emerging agents like brolucizumab show promise but require long-term safety data. Conclusion: Bevacizumab is the most cost-effective anti-VEGF therapy for nAMD, balancing efficacy and affordability. Policymakers should prioritize its inclusion in formularies, especially in resource-limited settings, while addressing regulatory and safety barriers.

References

A. Danyliv, Julie May Glanville, R. McCool, Alberto Ferreira, A. Skelly, and R. P. Jacob. “The Clinical Effectiveness of Ranibizumab Treat and Extend Regimen in nAMD: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.” Advances in Therapy, 2017.

A. Fursova, N. V. Chubar, M. S. Tarasov, M. Vasilyeva, and O. Gusarevich. “[Anti-VEGF Therapy for Age-Related Macular Degeneration].” Vestnik Oftal Mologii, 2018.

A. Tricco, Sonia M. Thomas, Erin Lillie, A. Veroniki, J. Hamid, B. Pham, Taehoon Lee, et al. “Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.” Systematic Reviews, 2021.

Aaron Y. Lee, Cecilia S. Lee, C. Egan, C. Bailey, R. Johnston, S. Natha, R. Hamilton, et al. “UK AMD/DR EMR REPORT IX: Comparative Effectiveness of Predominantly as Needed (PRN) Ranibizumab Versus Continuous Aflibercept in UK Clinical Practice.” British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2017.

Allison Low, A. Faridi, K. Bhavsar, G. Cockerham, M. Freeman, Rochelle Fu, Robin A. Paynter, Karli K. Kondo, and D. Kansagara. “Comparative Effectiveness and Harms of Intravitreal Antivascular En- dothelial Growth Factor Agents for Three Retinal Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2018.

Amin Hatamnejad, Rohan Dadak, S. Orr, C. Wykoff, and N. Choudhry. “Systematic Review of Efficacy and Meta-Analysis of Safety of Ranibizumab Biosimilars Relative to Reference Ranibizumab Anti-VEGF Therapy for nAMD Treatment.” BMJ Open Ophthalmology, 2023.

Archana Airody, Heidi A Baseler, Julie Seymour, V. Allgar, R. Mukherjee, Louise Downey, S. Dhar-munshi, et al. “Treatment of Age‐related Macular Degeneration with Aflibercept Using a Treat, Extend and Fixed Protocol; A 4‐year Study of Treatment Outcomes, Durability, Safety and Quality of Life (An Extension to the MATE Randomised Controlled Trial).” Acta Ophthalmologica, 2023.

B. Pham, Sonia M. Thomas, Erin Lillie, Taehoon Lee, J. Hamid, Trevor Richter, Ghayath Janoudi, et al. “Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Retinal Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” BMJ Open, 2019.

C. L. Nguyen, L. Oh, E. Wong, Joe Q. Wei, and Michael Chilov. “Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.” BMC Ophthalmology, 2018.

D. Austeng, T. S. Morken, Stine Bolme, T. Follestad, and Vidar Halsteinli. “Nurse-Administered Intravitreal Injections of Anti-VEGF: Study Protocol for Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial of Safety, Cost and Patient Satisfaction.” BMC Ophthalmology, 2016.

Daniel F. Martin, M. Maguire, S. Fine, G. Ying, G. Jaffe, J. Grunwald, C. Toth, Maryann Redford, and F. Ferris. “Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab for Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Two-Year Results.” Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2020.

Ekta Rishi, P. Rishi, Vishal R. Sharma, V. Koundanya, and Renu Athanikar. “Long-Term Outcomes of Combination Photodynamic Therapy with Ranibizumab or Bevacizumab for Treatment of Wet Age- Related Macular Degeneration.” Oman Journal of Ophthalmology, 2016.

F. Asten, Charlotte T. J. Michels, C. Hoyng, Gert Jan Wilt, B., Jeroen B. Klevering, M. Rovers, and J. Grutters. “The Cost-Effectiveness of Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab and Aflibercept for the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration—A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from a Societal Perspective.” PLoS ONE, 2018.

F. Matonti, J. Korobelnik, C. Dot, V. Gualino, V. Soler, S. Mrejen, M. Delyfer, et al. “Comparative Ef- fectiveness of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2022.

Gary C. Brown, Melissa M. Brown, Heidi B. Lieske, A. Turpcu, and Y. Rajput. “The Comparative Ef- fectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Ranibizumab for Neovascular Macular Degeneration Revisited.” International Journal of Retina and Vitreous, 2017.

Haley S. D’Souza, K. Kapoor, and A. Wagner. “Ziv-Aflibercept for Better Regulating Neovascular Age- Related Macular Degeneration (ZEBRA): A Prospective, Randomized Trial.” Seminars in Ophthalmology, 2021.

Hao Xie, Huan Ju, Jing Lu, Xing Wang, and H. Peng. “Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Conbercept and Aflibercept in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.” Scientific Reports, 2024.

J. Carrasco, G. Pietsch, Marie-Pierre Nicolas, C. Koerber, C. Bennison, and Jisu Yoon. “Real-World Effec- tiveness and Real-World Cost-Effectiveness of Intravitreal Aflibercept and Intravitreal Ranibizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies.” Advances in Therapy, 2019.

J. Wachtlin, N. Eter, Z. Hasanbasic, Georgios Keramas, C. Rech, H. Sachs, H. Schilling, P. Wiedemann, and C. Framme. “Importance of Continuous Treatment with Intravitreal Aflibercept Injections in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration—12-Month Post Hoc Analysis of the PERSEUS Real-World Evidence Study.” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2020.

João Estarreja, Priscila Mendes, C. Silva, P. Camacho, and V. Mateus. “The Efficacy, Safety, and Efficiency of the Off-Label Use of Bevacizumab in Patients Diagnosed With Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” JMIR Research Protocols, 2022.

João Estarreja, Priscila Mendes, Carina Silva, P. Camacho, and V. Mateus. “Off-Label Use of Bevacizumab in Patients Diagnosed with Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Pharmaceuticals, 2024.

K. Luu, J. Seal, M. Green, Carolyn Winskill, and M. Attar. “Effect of Anti‐VEGF Therapy on the Disease Progression of Neovascular Age‐Related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Model‐Based Meta‐Analysis.” Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2021.

Lu Ye, Z. Jiaqi, Jianchao Wang, Zhao-hui Feng, Yao Liang, and Xiaohui Zhang. “Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Regimens for Neovascular Age-Related Macular De- generation: Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.” Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease, 2020.

M. Elshout, C. Webers, Margriet I. van der Reis, and J. Schouten. “A Systematic Review on the Quality, Validity and Usefulness of Current Cost‐effectiveness Studies for Treatments of Neovascular Age‐related Macular Degeneration.” Acta Ophthalmologica, 2018.

M. Gemenetzi, and P. Patel. “A Systematic Review of the Treat and Extend Treatment Regimen with Anti-VEGF Agents for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.” Ophthalmology and Therapy, 2017.

M. Gillies, A. Hunyor, J. Arnold, R. Guymer, S. Wolf, F. Pecheur, M. Munk, and I. McAllister. “Macular Atrophy in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Ranibizumab and Aflibercept (RIVAL Study).” Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2019.

M. Jin, H. Dai, X. Zhang, Y. Wang, M. Han, H. Zhang, Yang Liu, et al. “A Traditional Chinese Patent Medicine ZQMT for Neovascular Age- Related Macular Degeneration: A Multicenter Randomized Clini- cal Trial.” Current Molecular Medicine, 2019.

M. Ohji, P. Lanzetta, J. Korobelnik, P. Wojciechowski, Vanessa Taieb, C. Deschaseaux, Daniel Janer, and C. Tuckmantel. “Efficacy and Treatment Burden of Intravitreal Aflibercept Versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab Treat-and-Extend Regimens at 2 Years: Network Meta-Analysis Incorporating Individual Patient Data Meta-Regression and Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.” Advances in Therapy, 2020.

M. Pochopień, M. Palarcyzk, E. Clay, Y. Hikichi, N. Mita, Y. Kidoguchi, C. Deschaseaux, and M. Toumi. “PSS5 COMPARING TWO TREAT-AND-EXTEND ANTI-VEGF REGIMENS FOR MANAGING WET AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM IN FRANCE.” Value in Health, 2019.

———. “PSS7 COMPARING TWO TREAT-AND-EXTEND ANTI-VEGF REGIMENS FOR MANAG- ING WET AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM IN JAPAN.” Value in Health, 2019.

Nicola Ferrante, D. Ritrovato, R. Bitonti, and G. Furneri. “Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Brolucizumab Versus Aflibercept for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD) in Italy.” BMC Health Services Research, 2022.

Pengxiang Zhou, Si-qian Zheng, Ente Wang, P. Men, and S. Zhai. “Conbercept for Treatment of Neovas- cular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema or Pathologic Myopia Choroidal Neovascularization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2021.

R. Finger, V. Daien, B. Eldem, J. Talks, J. Korobelnik, P. Mitchell, T. Sakamoto, T. Wong, K. Pantiri, and J. Carrasco. “Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration – a Systematic Review of the Impact of Anti-VEGF on Patient Outcomes and Healthcare Systems.” BMC Ophthalmology, 2020.

R. Guymer, C. Markey, I. McAllister, M. Gillies, A. Hunyor, and J. Arnold. “Tolerating Subretinal Fluid in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treated with Ranibizumab Using a Treat-and-Extend Regimen: FLUID Study 24-Month Results.” Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2019.

R. Sidhu, A. Danyliv, A. Skelly, R. Freitas, P. Cooney, U. Vudumula, L. Marshall, and F. Woodcock. “POSB100 Cost-Comparison Model of Brolucizumab for the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degen- eration.” Value in Health, 2022.

S. Rufai, H. Almuhtaseb, R. Paul, B. Stuart, T. Kendrick, Helena Lee, and A. Lotery. “A Systematic Review to Assess the ‘Treat-and-Extend’ Dosing Regimen for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using Ranibizumab.” Eye, 2017.

Sankha Amarakoon, J. Martinez-Ciriano, L. I. van den Born, S. Baarsma, and T. Missotten. “Bevacizumab in Age‐related Macular Degeneration: A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of on‐demand Therapy Every 4 or 8 Weeks.” Acta Ophthalmologica, 2018.

Sharon D. Solomon, K. Lindsley, M. Krzystolik, S. Vedula, and B. Hawkins. “Intravitreal Bevacizumab Versus Ranibizumab for Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Findings from a Cochrane Systematic Review.” Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2016.

Xiaobei Yin, Ting He, Shan-shan Yang, Hui Cui, and Wenlan Jiang. “Efficacy and Safety of Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor (Anti-VEGF) in Treating Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Immunological Research, 2022.

Zu-hua Sun, Yating Yang, Bing Lin, Ying-Chen Huang, Rong Zhou, Chun Yang, Ying-zi Li, Shenghai Huang, and Xiaoling Liu. “Comparative Efficacy of Aflibercept and Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Retinal Pigment Epithelial Detachment: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.” BMC Ophthalmology, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-26

How to Cite

Which Anti-VEGF Therapy (Ranibizumab, Bevacizumab, or Aflibercept) Demonstrates The Most Cost-Effective Outcomes For Treating Age-Related Macular Degeneration ? : A Systematic Review (Olivia Putri Chairunnisa, Mia Audina, & Irawati , Trans.). (2025). The Indonesian Journal of General Medicine, 12(3), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.70070/vbsedq58